Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 4:52:21 GMT
Purely territorial conflicts, and if we add to this the tensions that arise dueSuch a disappointing result was reached in the fundamental study "The Frequency of Wars", publissocs of wars. Something pushes governments or opposition leaders to resolve issues with weapons. It turned out that althouhed recently in the journal Economic History Review, its authors, professor of the University of Warwick (Universitu of Warwick) and the University of Humboldt (Humboldt-Universität) Mark Harrison (Mark Harrison) and Nikolaus Wolf (Nikolaus Wolf). According to researchers who have "shoveled" a huge amount of statistical data, military operations, including local interstate conflicts, are occurring more and more frequently every year. ts: the more all kinds of borders, the more likely are.
After from 1914 to an average of 36 local wars broke out on the planet per year. analyzing the available statistical data, Harrison and Wolf Panama Phone Number calculated that between 1870 and 2001, wars between states broke out more often by about 2% per year. As a basic hypothesis, the researchers took the idea that the increase in the number of wars is due to the increase in the number of states (in 1870 there were only 47 of them, in 2001 they became 187) and the global development of the economy. Simple logic suggests: the more all kinds of borders, the more likely are purely territorial conflicts, and if we add to this the tensions that arise due to economic, ideological and religious reasons, then the total number of potential "showdowns" can grow many times. According to the research: in the period from 1870 to 1913 - there were approximately 6 conflicts per year.
Researchers to the conclusion of the existence of gh great powers became the initiators of military actions more often, the overall frequency of conflicts involving them durinsome factor not directly related to the economic and territorial status of the state, but which has a noticeable impact on the statistics of wars.e there is a large share of GDP per capita). These statistics contradict the generally accepted economic theory that rich countries seek to resolve the maximum number of possible conflicts A more detailed analysis was subsequently carried out, which took into account all manifestations of aggression and unfriendliness of the state, which in principle can develop into "full-fledged" military actions (demonstration of force during exercises on the borders of a potential enemy, closing borders with the expulsion of diplomats, acts of economic pressure, etc.
After from 1914 to an average of 36 local wars broke out on the planet per year. analyzing the available statistical data, Harrison and Wolf Panama Phone Number calculated that between 1870 and 2001, wars between states broke out more often by about 2% per year. As a basic hypothesis, the researchers took the idea that the increase in the number of wars is due to the increase in the number of states (in 1870 there were only 47 of them, in 2001 they became 187) and the global development of the economy. Simple logic suggests: the more all kinds of borders, the more likely are purely territorial conflicts, and if we add to this the tensions that arise due to economic, ideological and religious reasons, then the total number of potential "showdowns" can grow many times. According to the research: in the period from 1870 to 1913 - there were approximately 6 conflicts per year.
Researchers to the conclusion of the existence of gh great powers became the initiators of military actions more often, the overall frequency of conflicts involving them durinsome factor not directly related to the economic and territorial status of the state, but which has a noticeable impact on the statistics of wars.e there is a large share of GDP per capita). These statistics contradict the generally accepted economic theory that rich countries seek to resolve the maximum number of possible conflicts A more detailed analysis was subsequently carried out, which took into account all manifestations of aggression and unfriendliness of the state, which in principle can develop into "full-fledged" military actions (demonstration of force during exercises on the borders of a potential enemy, closing borders with the expulsion of diplomats, acts of economic pressure, etc.